Definitive Prostate IMRT/VMAT

Overview

Definitive external beam radiotherapy treats the prostate — and, depending on risk, the seminal vesicles and pelvic lymph nodes — with IMRT or VMAT, most often in 20 or 39–40 fractions. The planning challenge is anatomical: the rectum lies directly behind the target and the bladder sits above and in front, so plans are judged as much by their rectal and bladder DVHs as by target coverage.

This page covers setup, target volumes, organs at risk with cited constraints, and plan evaluation. The numbers — prescriptions, margins and constraints — belong to the protocol you’re following.

Start here: I’m planning my first prostate case — a step-by-step learning roadmap.

Simulation & Daily Setup

The prostate moves with bladder and rectal filling. Setup is about making each day's anatomy look like the planning CT.

Bladder filling
A consistently full bladder moves bladder wall and bowel away from the high dose and keeps the prostate where it was planned.

What is it?

A drinking protocol so the bladder is comfortably full — and similarly full — at simulation and every treatment.

Why does it matter?

A fuller bladder lifts more of the bladder wall and small bowel away from the high-dose region. Just as important is consistency: a bladder much fuller or emptier than at simulation shifts the prostate and changes the dose to both organs.

Protocols ask for a comfortably full bladder and an empty rectum, with consistent volumes between simulation and treatment. How much and how long before is set by department policy.

Rectal preparation
An empty, consistent rectum stops gas and stool from pushing the prostate out of position.

What is it?

Measures to keep the rectum empty and consistent — diet advice, micro-enemas or laxatives, depending on the department.

Why does it matter?

Gas and stool in the rectum can push the prostate forward and change its position from day to day. A distended rectum at simulation can also lead to a plan that doesn't match treatment days.

If the rectum is distended on the planning CT, many departments re-simulate rather than plan on unrepresentative anatomy.

Fiducial markers
Markers in the prostate let daily imaging match the prostate itself, not the bones.

What is it?

Small radiopaque markers implanted in the prostate so its position can be seen on daily imaging.

Why does it matter?

The prostate moves independently of the pelvic bones. Matching on markers (or directly on soft tissue) targets the prostate itself rather than the bones around it.

Check that markers have not migrated between simulation and treatment, and know whether your department matches on markers, soft tissue or both.

Image fusion — MRI and PSMA PET
MRI shows the prostate's edges, apex and urethra far better than CT; PSMA PET can add disease within the prostate.

What is it?

Image fusion aligns an outside scan with the planning CT so the target can be drawn using information the CT doesn't show. For prostate this is mainly MRI — T2-weighted, with diffusion and contrast sequences when an intraprostatic lesion is to be boosted — and, where available, PSMA PET/CT. The registration is usually rigid and centered on the prostate, using the fiducial markers when they are present.

Why does it matter?

The prostate's boundaries, the apex and its edges against the rectum and penile bulb are much clearer on MRI than CT, and the urethra is contoured from MRI. MRI is particularly helpful with a hip prosthesis or a rectal spacer. A dominant lesion for a boost is identified on MRI and, if available, PSMA PET. Bladder and rectal filling change the prostate's shape and position, so the MRI is best taken with the same preparation as the planning CT.

Rectal spacer
A gel spacer moves the rectal wall away from the high-dose region.

What is it?

A gel injected between the prostate and rectum to increase the distance between them for the course of treatment.

Why does it matter?

More separation means the anterior rectal wall sits further from the high-dose region. A randomized trial reported lower rectal dose and a continued benefit in rectal toxicity.

Spacers change rectal anatomy on imaging; MRI helps delineate the prostate–spacer–rectum interface.

Immobilization
A reproducible leg and pelvic position keeps daily corrections small.

What is it?

Supine positioning with knee and ankle supports, and optionally a vacuum bag.

Why does it matter?

Reproducible leg and pelvic position keeps the femoral heads and pelvis consistent, so daily imaging corrections stay small.

Target Delineation

What each volume represents. Which structures are included, and every margin, come from your protocol.

CTV — Prostate ± seminal vesicles

Definition

The prostate, with or without part or all of the seminal vesicles depending on risk group.

Why it matters

How much seminal vesicle is included is one of the main risk-based decisions in definitive prostate treatment, and it changes rectal and bladder dose considerably.

Contouring resources

Organ contouring guides →

GTV / DIL — Dominant intraprostatic lesion

Definition

A visible tumor nodule within the prostate, usually defined on MRI or PSMA PET.

Why it matters

Some approaches deliver a boost to the dominant lesion. When boosting, OAR tolerance takes priority over boost coverage.

Contouring resources

Organ contouring guides →

Pelvic nodes — Elective nodal CTV

Definition

Pelvic lymph node regions treated electively in higher-risk disease. More →

Why it matters

Adding nodes enlarges the treated volume upward, bringing small and large bowel into play.

Contouring resources

Organ contouring guides →

PTV — Planning Target Volume

Definition

An expansion for setup and delivery uncertainty.

Why it matters

The posterior PTV margin overlaps the anterior rectal wall. How that overlap is handled — and how daily image guidance is used — largely decides the rectal DVH.

Contouring resources

Organ contouring guides →

Conventional vs Moderate Hypofractionation

Definitive prostate radiotherapy is now delivered either in around 39–40 fractions or in 20 fractions. Randomized trials — CHHiP, PROFIT and HYPRO — underpin moderate hypofractionation.

For planners the key point is that the constraints change with the schedule. A rectal Vx written for 2 Gy fractions cannot be applied to a 3 Gy-per-fraction plan: the 20-fraction constraints below come from the CHHiP protocol, the 39–40 fraction constraints from other sources. Use the column for the schedule you are planning.

Organs at Risk & Dose Constraints

Click an organ for its anatomy, why it matters and contouring resources. Superscripts link to the study behind each value.

Organ60 Gy / 20 fxModerate hypofractionation70 Gy / 28 fxModerate hypofractionation78–80 Gy / 39–40 fxConventional
RectumAcceptable limits; stricter ideal targets exist.
  • V40.8 Gy <60%1,2
  • V60 Gy <3%1,2
  • V70 Gy ≤10%3
  • V65 Gy ≤10%3
  • V40 Gy ≤35%3
  • V50 Gy <50%4
  • V70 Gy <20%4
Bladder
  • V48.6 Gy <25%1,2
  • V60 Gy <5%1,2
  • V70 Gy ≤15%3
  • V65 Gy ≤25%3
  • V40 Gy ≤65%3
  • V65 Gy <50%4,5
  • V70 Gy <35%4,5
Femoral Heads
  • V40.8 Gy <50%1,2
  • V40 Gy 0%3
  • V50 Gy <5%4
Penile BulbNever at the expense of PTV coverage.—
  • Mean dose <50 Gy3
  • Mean dose <52.5 Gy5,6
Small Bowel—
  • D0.035 cc ≤54 Gy3
  • V40 Gy ≤1%3
  • Peritoneal cavity V45 Gy <195 cc5
Large Bowel / SigmoidGeneral conventional limits, not prostate-specific.—
  • D0.035 cc ≤60 Gy3
  • V50 Gy ≤1%3
  • V45 Gy <5% or <20 cc7
  • V35 Gy <35% or 150 cc7
  • Rectum: solid organ from the rectosigmoid junction to the bottom of the ischial tuberosities or the anal verge, whichever is shorter.
References (7)
  1. CHHiP (Dearnaley 2016) — Conventional versus hypofractionated high-dose intensity-modulated radiotherapy for prostate cancer: 5-year outcomes of the randomised, non-inferiority, phase 3 CHHiP trial. Lancet Oncol. 2016;17(8):1047–1060 Source
  2. CHHiP PROs (Wilkins 2015) — Hypofractionated radiotherapy versus conventionally fractionated radiotherapy for patients with intermediate-risk localised prostate cancer: 2-year patient-reported outcomes of the randomised, non-inferiority, phase 3 CHHiP trial. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16(16):1605–1616 Source
  3. ASTRO DVH Compendium 2026 — Dose-Volume Histogram Compendium of Dose Constraints for Treatment Planning: An ASTRO Consensus Paper. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2026;16(3):294–317 Source
  4. ENZARAD protocol — ENZARAD (ANZUP 1303): a randomised phase 3 trial of enzalutamide in androgen deprivation therapy with radiation therapy for high risk, clinically localised, prostate cancer. ENZARAD / ANZUP 1303 trial protocol Source
  5. QUANTEC — QUANTEC — Quantitative Analyses of Normal Tissue Effects in the Clinic. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010;76(3 Suppl):S1–S160 Source
  6. RTOG 0126 — RTOG 0126: A Phase III Randomized Study of High Dose 3D-CRT/IMRT Versus Standard Dose 3D-CRT/IMRT in Patients Treated for Localized Prostate Cancer. Protocol, RTOG 0126 Source
  7. NCCN Anal Cancer v2.2022 — NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology — Anal Cancer, Version 2.2022. NCCN Guidelines, Anal Cancer, Version 2.2022 Source

Values quoted from eviQ 234 (last reviewed 7 November 2024; review due 31 December 2026), ASTRO DVH Compendium 2026 and CORSAIR, checked by DoseLab on 2026-10-14. Verify against your protocol, institutional policy and physician directive before clinical use.

Search all prostate constraints in the Constraint Finder →

Protocols & Literature

All prostate literature →