Consensus CT delineation guidelines for head and neck organs at risk from eight cooperative groups, with anatomical descriptions and example images. Citation checked against Crossref; content not yet reviewed by DoseLab.
Head & Neck Planning Essentials
Every head and neck plan — whatever the subsite — is built the same way: a mask for daily reproducibility, targets at two or three dose levels delivered together with a simultaneous integrated boost or in phases with a sequential boost, and the same crowded set of organs at risk. This page covers that shared foundation once. The subsite pages build on it and describe only what changes.
Simulation & Daily Setup
The same for nearly every subsite. Subsite pages note only what they add.
Mask and head position
A six- to seven-week course with tight margins needs the head, neck and shoulders in the same place every day.
What is it?
Supine with the head neutral in a thermoplastic mask, a neck support or vacuum bag, and the shoulders pulled down as far as possible.
Why does it matter?
Treatment runs for six to seven weeks with millimeter-scale margins around the cord and brainstem, so the head and neck must return to the same position every day. Low shoulders keep them out of the lower-neck beams and arcs.
Bite block, mouth bung and cheek spacer
Mouth devices push normal tissue away from the target and make the mouth position reproducible.
What is it?
A device held in the mouth during simulation and treatment. A cheek spacer is wax placed against the inside of the cheek.
Why does it matter?
It moves normal tissue — the tongue, palate or cheek — away from the target, and it makes the mouth position reproducible. Mostly used for oral cavity and some oropharynx targets.
Wire and bolus
Wire marks scars and skin disease on the CT, and bolus brings dose to targets at the skin.
What is it?
Radio-opaque wire on scars or skin involvement; tissue-equivalent bolus over targets near the skin.
Why does it matter?
Wire shows the scar or skin disease on the planning CT. Megavoltage beams under-dose the surface, so bolus is considered when the target reaches the skin.
Planning CT
A thin-slice contrast CT from the vertex to below the carina, with metal artifact reduction where needed.
What is it?
A CT with slices of 2 mm or less, commonly from the vertex to 1 cm below the carina, with IV contrast when appropriate.
Why does it matter?
Contrast separates nodes from vessels. Dental fillings cause streak artifact, so metal artifact reduction may be needed.
Image fusion — MRI and PET/CT
Diagnostic MRI and PET/CT fused with the planning CT show soft-tissue, skull-base and nodal disease the CT can't.
What is it?
Image fusion aligns an outside scan with the planning CT so the target can be drawn using information the CT doesn't show. For head and neck this is the staging PET/CT, MRI and diagnostic CT. MRI matters most near the skull base or when perineural spread is suspected; it is ideally taken as close to the treatment position as possible, with distortion correction applied.
Why does it matter?
MRI shows soft-tissue and skull-base spread; PET helps define gross disease and involved nodes, and nodes that are equivocal on PET are often still included in an intermediate-risk volume. Diagnostic scans are taken without the mask, so head and neck position can differ — check the registration at the primary and at the involved nodes rather than relying on one overall match. When IV contrast can't be given, one template recommends fusing PET/CT and MRI for tumor and organ definition.
Daily imaging and replanning
Daily cone-beam CT catches weight loss and tumor shrinkage that may call for a new plan.
What is it?
Daily cone-beam CT matched to bone, with a check of soft tissue and the body outline.
Why does it matter?
Weight loss and tumor or node shrinkage change the anatomy over the course and loosen the mask fit. Departments need a way to spot those changes and decide whether their dose effect needs a new plan.
Dose Levels & Treatment Time
How head and neck schedules are built. The schedules quoted on the subsite pages are SIB schedules from published protocols; sequential-boost schedules use different dose levels, set by your protocol.
Simultaneous integrated boost (SIB)
One plan that delivers a different dose per fraction to each target level in the same session — for example 2.0, 1.8 and 1.6 Gy per fraction, giving 70, 63 and 56 Gy over 35 fractions.
What is it?
One plan that delivers a different dose per fraction to each target level in the same session — for example 2.0, 1.8 and 1.6 Gy per fraction, giving 70, 63 and 56 Gy over 35 fractions.
Why does it matter?
The gross disease, the high-risk tissue around it and the elective neck all receive their prescriptions in one plan over the same number of fractions, instead of sequential phases. The steep dose steps between levels are where coverage and organ sparing compete.
Sequential boost
Treating in phases: a first plan takes every target level to the lower (elective) dose, then one or more boost plans — sometimes called cone-downs — take the higher-risk volumes up to their full dose.
What is it?
Treating in phases: a first plan takes every target level to the lower (elective) dose, then one or more boost plans — sometimes called cone-downs — take the higher-risk volumes up to their full dose.
Why does it matter?
Also a common approach. Every phase uses a standard dose per fraction, so the elective neck is not treated with smaller fractions as it is in an SIB. The trade-off is several plans instead of one: dose from all phases must be summed, and organ limits apply to the composite.
Naming the dose levels
Levels are named by risk (high, intermediate and low dose — HD, ID and LD) or by dose (for example PTV_7000, PTV_6300, PTV_5600).
What is it?
Levels are named by risk (high, intermediate and low dose — HD, ID and LD) or by dose (for example PTV_7000, PTV_6300, PTV_5600). More →
Why does it matter?
The naming differs between protocols; what matters is knowing which structure carries which prescription. AAPM TG-263 gives standard naming conventions.
Overall treatment time
The number of days from the first to the last fraction.
What is it?
The number of days from the first to the last fraction.
Why does it matter?
Longer overall time can reduce locoregional control and survival, so missed days — holidays, machine service, treatment breaks — are usually made up, for example with two fractions in a day or an extra treatment day.
Accelerated fractionation
Six fractions a week instead of five, so the same total dose finishes in about six weeks. The sixth fraction is a second daily fraction at least six hours apart, or a weekend treatment.
What is it?
Six fractions a week instead of five, so the same total dose finishes in about six weeks. The sixth fraction is a second daily fraction at least six hours apart, or a weekend treatment. More →
Why does it matter?
Shortening overall time can improve tumor control. It may be considered for radiotherapy alone and was used with chemotherapy in trials such as RTOG 1016.
Target Delineation
The volumes every subsite uses. What goes into each one changes by subsite — see the subsite pages. Expansions come only from your protocol.
GTVp and GTVn — Gross primary and nodal disease
Definition
All gross disease seen on imaging, examination and endoscopy — the primary (GTVp) and the involved nodes (GTVn).
Why it matters
Endoscopy findings and fused MRI and PET often show mucosal or soft-tissue disease that is hard to see on CT alone, so the physician's examination notes matter as much as the images.
Contouring resources
High-dose CTV — Gross disease with a margin
Definition
The gross disease expanded to cover nearby microscopic spread, then edited back from anatomical barriers such as bone, air and fascia that the tumor has not crossed.
Why it matters
Editing to anatomy keeps the high dose out of tissue the tumor cannot reach — often the difference between sparing and overdosing a nearby organ.
Contouring resources
Intermediate-dose CTV — High-risk tissue
Definition
Areas at higher risk of microscopic disease: routes of contiguous spread from the primary, equivocal nodes, and whole subsites when the protocol calls for them.
Why it matters
Some protocols treat this volume to the low-dose level instead, so not every plan has three dose levels.
Contouring resources
Low-dose CTV — Elective neck
Definition
Uninvolved nodal levels at risk of microscopic spread, contoured using the neck level definitions.
Why it matters
Which levels are included — and whether one side or both — is one of the biggest differences between subsites and nodal stages, and it largely decides how much of the salivary glands and swallowing structures can be spared.
Contouring resources
PTVs and evaluation volumes — Planning target volumes
Definition
Each CTV expanded for setup uncertainty. Coverage is often judged on a copy cropped back from the skin.
Why it matters
Near the skin, build-up means the PTV cannot be fully covered without bolus. For example, RTOG 0920 evaluates coverage on PTVs that exclude the tissue within 8 mm of the skin.
Contouring resources
Organs at Risk & Dose Constraints
One table for every subsite. Click an organ for its anatomy, why it matters and contouring resources. Superscripts link to the study behind each value.
| Organ | Conventional fractionation70 Gy / 35 fx definitive · 60–66 Gy / 30–33 fx post-op |
|---|---|
| Spinal Cord | |
| BrainstemHigher doses may be appropriate depending on the clinical situation. | |
| Optic Chiasm & Optic Nerves | |
| Temporal Lobes | |
| Pituitary GlandGiven for nasopharynx cancer. |
|
| CochleaKeep as low as possible to reduce hearing loss. | |
| Lens |
|
| Globes (Eyes) | |
| Parotid GlandsReduce the mean dose to both glands as much as possible. | |
| Submandibular Glands |
|
| Oral CavityFor oral cavity cancers, evaluated outside the PTV. Avoid hotspots above 60 Gy. | |
| Lips | |
| MandibleLimiting intermediate-dose volumes may reduce osteoradionecrosis risk. | |
| Pharyngeal Constrictors | |
| LarynxGlottic and supraglottic larynx, when it is not part of the target. |
|
| Cervical EsophagusFor oral cavity and oropharynx cancers; higher doses are expected with larynx cancer. |
|
| Carotid ArteriesEspecially when the neck is not treated, such as early glottic cancer. |
|
| Brachial PlexusTarget coverage takes priority. |
|
- Limits are for conventional fractionation (about 2 Gy per fraction) and are used for definitive and post-operative treatment alike. The source also uses this table for its hypofractionated early glottic schedules.
- Oral cavity, lip and cervical esophagus goals come from a 60 Gy post-operative trial; the source applies them to definitive treatment as well.
- The source table also lists the retina, lacrimal gland, temporomandibular joints and hippocampus.
References (16)
- QUANTEC spinal cord — Radiation dose–volume effects in the spinal cord (QUANTEC). Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010;76(3 Suppl):S42–S49 Source
- Lee 2019 NPC guideline — International Guideline on Dose Prioritization and Acceptance Criteria in Radiation Therapy Planning for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2019;105(3):567–580 Source
- GORTEC 2004-03 — Intensity-modulated radiotherapy in head and neck cancer: results of the prospective study GORTEC 2004–03. Radiother Oncol. 2012;103(1):57–62 Source
- Emami 2013 — Tolerance of normal tissue to therapeutic radiation. Reports of Radiotherapy and Oncology. 2013;1(1):35–48
- RTOG 0920 — RTOG 0920 protocol — A Phase III Study of Postoperative Radiation Therapy (IMRT) +/- Cetuximab for Locally-Advanced Resected Head and Neck Cancer. Protocol document, RTOG 0920 Source
- QUANTEC brainstem — Radiation associated brainstem injury (QUANTEC). Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010;76(3 Suppl):S36–S41 Source
- Scoccianti 2015 — Organs at risk in the brain and their dose-constraints in adults and in children: a radiation oncologist's guide for delineation in everyday practice. Radiother Oncol. 2015;114(2):230–238 Source
- eviQ 5049 — Head and neck oropharynx squamous cell carcinoma definitive EBRT with or without chemotherapy (eviQ ID 5049). eviQ Radiation Oncology protocol 5049 Source
- QUANTEC hearing — Radiation therapy and hearing loss (QUANTEC). Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010;76(3 Suppl):S50–S57 Source
- RTOG 0615 — RTOG 0615 protocol — A Phase II Study of Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy Using Three-Dimensional Conformal Radiotherapy (3D-CRT) or Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) + Bevacizumab (BV) for Locally or Regionally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Cancer. Protocol document, RTOG 0615 Source
- DAHANCA 2025 — Danish Head and Neck Cancer Group (DAHANCA) Radiotherapy Quality Assurance Guidelines 2025. Radiother Oncol. 2025;210:111028 Source
- Timmerman 2022 — A Story of Hypofractionation and the Table on the Wall. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2022;112(1):4–21 Source
- Eisbruch 1999 — Dose, volume, and function relationships in parotid salivary glands following conformal and intensity-modulated irradiation of head and neck cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1999;45(3):577–587 Source
- Murdoch-Kinch 2008 — Dose-effect relationships for the submandibular salivary glands and implications for their sparing by intensity modulated radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008;72(2):373–382 Source
- Kubota 2021 — Risk factors for osteoradionecrosis of the jaw in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Radiat Oncol. 2021;16(1):1 Source
- Batth 2014 — Practical considerations in reducing swallowing dysfunction following concurrent chemoradiotherapy with intensity-modulated radiotherapy for head and neck cancer. Head Neck. 2014;36(2):291–298 Source
Values quoted from eviQ 5049 (first approved 30 April 2026; review due 30 June 2030) and RTOG 0920, checked by DoseLab on 2026-09-24. Verify against your protocol, institutional policy and physician directive before clinical use.
Search all head & neck constraints in the Constraint Finder →
Protocols & Literature
The 2013 update of the international consensus on the anatomical boundaries of the neck node levels. Citation checked against Crossref; content not yet reviewed by DoseLab.
Updated consensus on selecting elective nodal levels for definitive radiotherapy of oral cavity, oropharynx, hypopharynx, larynx, nasopharynx, sinonasal and unknown-primary cancers. Citation checked against Crossref; content not yet reviewed by DoseLab.
Consensus guidelines from multiple international groups for delineating the primary-tumor CTV in definitive radiotherapy of squamous cell carcinoma of the larynx, hypopharynx, oropharynx and oral cavity. Citation checked against Crossref; content not yet reviewed by DoseLab.
CT-based guidelines for delineating the organs at risk involved in swallowing. Citation checked against Crossref; content not yet reviewed by DoseLab.
The 2025 update of the DAHANCA radiotherapy quality-assurance guidelines, with new chapters on planning complex targets and hypofractionation. Citation checked against Crossref; content not yet reviewed by DoseLab.
NRG Oncology's page for RTOG 0920, a phase 3 trial of post-operative IMRT with or without cetuximab for intermediate-risk resected head and neck cancer. The protocol prescribes 60 Gy in 2 Gy fractions (optional 66 Gy high-risk and 56 Gy at-risk levels) and lists IMRT planning goals for the cord and brainstem planning risk volumes, lips, oral cavity, parotids, pharynx, cervical esophagus, larynx and mandible, with a planning priority order. DoseLab read section 6.5.4 of the version dated 25 January 2016 (copy hosted by the University of Cincinnati) for the oral cavity, lip and cervical esophagus values in the head and neck table.
An international expert guideline that ranks targets and organs at risk for nasopharyngeal carcinoma planning and gives ideal and acceptable dose criteria, including D0.03 cc near-maximum doses. A correction was published later in 2019. Citation checked against Crossref; content not yet reviewed by DoseLab.
Randomized trial of five versus six fractions per week of conventionally fractionated radiotherapy for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Citation checked against Crossref; content not yet reviewed by DoseLab.
Individual-patient-data meta-analysis of chemotherapy added to locoregional treatment for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Citation checked against Crossref; content not yet reviewed by DoseLab.
Endorsed eviQ protocol for definitive radiotherapy of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma, with or without concurrent chemotherapy. It replaces the earlier separate radiotherapy-alone (740) and chemoradiation (3362) protocols. DoseLab's head and neck constraint table reproduces selected values from its organs-at-risk table, keeping eviQ's citation for each. The same organ table appears in eviQ's oral cavity, larynx/hypopharynx, early glottic, nasopharynx and post-operative head and neck protocols.
Endorsed eviQ protocol for adjuvant radiotherapy after resection of squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity, oropharynx, larynx or hypopharynx. It covers the risk features that prompt post-operative treatment, the added very-high-dose level for positive margins and extracapsular extension, and timing after surgery.